sadoimpacto-v-mayflower-state-militia-et-al

Mayflower District Court

#sadoimpacto-v-mayflower-state-militia-et-al

This is the start of #sadoimpacto-v-mayflower-state-militia-et-al channel.

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-23 04:08 a.m.

New Case

sadoimpacto v. Mayflower State Militia

Case Type

civil

Case Number

CV-198-25

clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:10 p.m.

BrendaPopplewell 2025-05-23 04:09 a.m.

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-23 11:34 a.m.

@Awesome

courthouse hallway

Thread messages not saved.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-24 10:16 p.m.

@Awesome

Can you summon dem

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome Can you summon dem

AwesomePIays 2025-05-24 10:59 p.m.

I will today (likely this evening).

AwesomePIays

I will today (likely this evening).

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-24 10:59 p.m.

Would you be able to hear the 2nd part to this case as well

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Would you be able to hear the 2nd part to this case as well

AwesomePIays 2025-05-25 01:17 a.m.

Sure. What is it about?

AwesomePIays

Sure. What is it about?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:17 a.m.

Its currently pending its a declaratory judgment action adjacent to this case

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:18 a.m.

Facts were semi-materially different so it didn't make sense to join the counts

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:18 a.m.

In here

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Its currently pending its a declaratory judgment action adjacent to this case

AwesomePIays 2025-05-25 01:24 a.m.

who’s the Defendant in this semi-adjacent action(edited)

AwesomePIays 2025-05-25 01:24 a.m.

also MSM?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:24 a.m.

Yes

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 01:14 p.m.

@Awesome

Can we summon them

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome Can we summon them

AwesomePIays 2025-05-30 09:55 a.m.

Apologies, I had an assignment due. This’ll be done tomorrow.

AwesomePIays

Apologies, I had an assignment due. This’ll be done tomorrow.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 04:01 p.m.

Cant we just do the summon command

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 04:01 p.m.

Its just /summon

AwesomePIays used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-30 04:08 p.m.

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @Crusoe

(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Its just /summon

AwesomePIays 2025-05-30 04:08 p.m.

I forgot that command existed, tbh.

AwesomePIays used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-30 04:48 p.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @Crusoe to the case channel.

Crusoe 2025-05-30 10:38 p.m.

I am here, your honor.

Crusoe 2025-05-30 10:38 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/hi-smiley-face-yellow-gif-8004301841562115300

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:08 p.m.

@Crusoe

Would you like to discuss a settlement sir

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:09 p.m.

Are you acting as their agent

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:09 p.m.

Umm

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:09 p.m.

What kind of settlement

Crusoe

What kind of settlement

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.

What do you believe is fair and just

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.

ok

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.

here is my offer

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.

Also, as as side question, does the MSM consider itself to have a coop with the MNG?

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:11 p.m.

I dont understand that question

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

can you rephrase that

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

A cooperative agreement

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

It says so on your commerce registry page

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

And its in the press as well

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

MSM does cooperate with MNG when times call for it

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

I mean like a literal agreement

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

I cant speak on that

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

Like you have an on-paper agreement

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

Well the MNG said that you do not

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.

In an affidavit

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

Yet it is advertised that you do

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

Ok well I said I cant speak on that

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

Am I being questioned right now?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

No

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

I'm confused and scared

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

you are a judge right?

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

you are interrogating me

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

I'm not this judge

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

Im the plaintiff

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

I didnt take the oath

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.

plaintiff? you're a sheriff?

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

why does your role say judge

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

I also happen to be a judge

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

I am a judge but I am the Plaintiff in this lawsuit against the MSM

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

what is a plantain

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

Its the name for someone who brings a lawsuit

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

You are the Defendant

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

so you are the judge and the suer??

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

that seems unfair

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.

AwesomePIays is the judge(edited)

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.

@Awesome

Motion to dismiss

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.

Plaintiff (the one bringing the suit) = Me
Defendant (MSM) = You
Judge = AwesomePIays

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.

ok can we settle this without a trial

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.

Ok!

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.

Make your offer to settle

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Plaintiff (the one bringing the suit) = Me Defendant (MSM) = You Judge = AwesomePIays

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:20 p.m.

sheeeeeit

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:20 p.m.

I aint even know dat fr

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:21 p.m.

thats real helpful mane

Crusoe

Make your offer to settle

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.

Here are my terms:
(1) $200,000 in damages.
(2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release channel:

“The Mayflower State Militia has no cooperative agreement, affiliation, endorsement, or operational relationship—formal or informal, explicit or implicit—with the Mayflower National Guard or any other branch of the Mayflower state government.”

(3) A formal public apology issued by the Defendant, acknowledging the following:
- The events described in the Complaint occurred;
- The conduct of Corporal TyrantAugustusCaesar and other members was unacceptable;
- The organization failed in its duty to protect the public and uphold the standards it claims to represent.
(4) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release channel:

“The Mayflower State Militia failed to properly supervise its personnel, failed to provide adequate emergency response during a critical incident, and failed to adhere to the standards required of any group conducting public operations involving civilians.”

(5) The parties agree that this settlement shall not be subject to a confidentiality agreement, and the Plaintiff may publicly discuss the terms and factual basis of the Complaint and resolution.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Here are my terms: (1) $200,000 in damages. (2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release chan...

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.

Counter offer:
You pay Mr. TyrantAugustusCaesar $1,000,000 UCD for the cosmetic damages sustained to his vehicle after your fat ahh rolled off his bumper.

Crusoe

Counter offer: You pay Mr. TyrantAugustusCaesar $1,000,000 UCD for the cosmetic damages sustained to his vehicle after your fat ahh rolled off his bumper.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.

Motion for contempt, sir @tyrant

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.

I summon my legal counsel @rafellus

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.

Almost pinged your employee!

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Motion for contempt, sir @tyrant

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.

contempt?

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.

I made my offer

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:25 p.m.

the judge hasnt said anything I dont know why you've rolled the ball so far

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:25 p.m.

as a judge id expect you to be more professional

Crusoe

I summon my legal counsel @rafellus

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:26 p.m.

now please add my legal counsel

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:26 p.m.

Awesome should be the one doing that but since I can I'll just do it for him

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-30 11:26 p.m.

Case Modified

@meowiitten

has added @rafellus to the case channel.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Here are my terms: (1) $200,000 in damages. (2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release chan...

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:27 p.m.

@rafellus

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.

Tsk tsk.

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.

sir, this plaintiff was berating me and asking me confusing questions

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.

Notifying you that the cap on punitive damages in this case is $900,000

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.

I didnt know how to act

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.

Ive never been on the stand before

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Notifying you that the cap on punitive damages in this case is $900,000

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.

Please do not discuss with my client any further, counselor.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Here are my terms: (1) $200,000 in damages. (2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release chan...

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.

@rafellus

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:29 p.m.

Yeah, we are denying that offer.

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:29 p.m.

My client is...at least.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:29 p.m.

Alright then

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

Thought it was fair, but I guess we can shoot for around $650,000 after trial

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

Seems fair

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

in

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

your

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

dreams

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

You can shoot for whatever you want, sadoimpacto.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

Actually, summary judgment sounds nice

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

mr sado

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.

Why is DanieICrusoe here? I understand your issue is with TyrantAugustusCaesar?

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.

yea

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.

He is not a named defendant

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.

Uh huh..

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.

Does the MSM claim to maintain a formal cooperative agreement with the MNG, sir?

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.

Are you going to answer my question as to why DanieICrusoe was summoned?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.

I didn't summon him personally

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.

He is the agent of the MSM

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.

He is properly summoned

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.

So what do you think DanieICrusoe has done wrong?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.

You can read the complaint, which I will likely be amending

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:33 p.m.

Right. DanieICrusoe is not, and for a long time has not been, affiliated with the named defendant.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:34 p.m.

Did he give up his ownership stake in the MSM?

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:34 p.m.

I am not interested in discussing my client's situation with you past what I have already commented on.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:34 p.m.

Alright, then I'll just have to move for discovery

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

And we can compel whatever we need from you(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

Sorry, I

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

Not sure how you intend to move for discovery when no defendant has been properly summoned

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

but ok king go off

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

slay lawyer

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

You could just say you have no ownership stake in the MSM and move on?

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

I cannot disclose that

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.

You could easily be discharged from this case

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.

Well, there is the matter of attorney's fees that my client has incurred

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.

as a result of the issue

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.

that you have created

rafellus

Not sure how you intend to move for discovery when no defendant has been properly summoned

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.

You have no claim for insufficient process and/or abuse of process if you act in an obstructive manner

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.

What obstructive manner am I acting in? lmao?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:37 p.m.

Okay, I'm going to prepare a notice of deposition then

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:37 p.m.

And you can put this all on the record

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:37 p.m.

And I'll just move for sanctions if you keep doing this

Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:38 p.m.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

And I'll just move for sanctions if you keep doing this

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:42 p.m.

Erm..nothing I have done warrants sanctions?

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:44 p.m.

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:46 p.m.

@meowiitten

you can sign stipulation that this court has no jurisdiction over my client, @Crusoe

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:46 p.m.

otherwise we will request an evidentiary hearing re a motion on the same subject

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:47 p.m.

and, when you realize my client has been improperly summoned, we will demand legal fees

rafellus 2025-05-30 11:47 p.m.

up to you

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

He is not a named defendant

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:15 a.m.

“You are REQUIRED to APPEAR before the court for a lawsuit where you are being sued.” Summons Issued to DanielCrusoe, ¶ 1.

this is the summons my client received, fyi

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.

if you want the named defendant, the mayflower state militia, to appear...maybe try issuing a summons that names it

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.

Well I didn't summon you, the Court summoned you

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.

I didn't ask for him to be summoned

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.

But alas

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.

All will be discovered soon

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.

alas the named defendant is not summoned

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.

you summoned some random guy with no connection to your complaint

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.

and, despite being told that by an officer of this court, you refuse to act

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.

I didn't name him in the complaint, nor did I summon him personally

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.

Are you going to sue the judge or the clerk now?

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.

nobody said anything about suing?

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.

i just said the named defendant is not summoned

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:18 a.m.

and you continue to ignore the fact that my client has no affiliation with the mayflower state militia, which i have repeatedly informed you

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:19 a.m.

Then you can ping the judge and tell him that

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:19 a.m.

And he will discharge you

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:19 a.m.

Why are you pinging me?

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:20 a.m.

i mean you did just try to coerce $200,000 from my client, so i want you to understand his relationship to this action

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:20 a.m.

before you go on harrassing him any further

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:20 a.m.

And you obstructed when I asked if he had any relation to the MSM

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

Refusing to answer when you have the answer is obstructive

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

first of all, I am under no obligation to answer your questions

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

It would've been a yes or a no

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

second of all, despite having no obligation, I did answer your questions

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

You are. You're under an ethical obligation

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

uh no

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

The information was unpriveleged and material to the process of this court

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

no ethical obligation charges me with providing you discovery absent a valid discovery request

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.

but ok go off king

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.

Hence why I was going to put him under deposition

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.

No problem

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.

We can do that

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.

can't do anything here until you actually issue a summons to the defendant /shrug

rafellus

Right. DanieICrusoe is not, and for a long time has not been, affiliated with the named defendant.

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.

anyway I've already answered your question

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.

I don't need a summons to give him a notice of deposition, actually

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.

Under our rules, its investigatory

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.

And can be done pre-suit

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.

false

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:24 a.m.

Rule 27(a)

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:24 a.m.

"Leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 15 days after service of the process and initial pleading."

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:25 a.m.

Well then I recant on it being pre-suit. That slipped my mind. But I can still depose him

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:26 a.m.

i mean i already answered your question is the fact you keep ignoring

rafellus

Right. DanieICrusoe is not, and for a long time has not been, affiliated with the named defendant.

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:26 a.m.

.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:27 a.m.

Tell the judge to discharge you then

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:27 a.m.

i already asked if you would sign a stipulation doing it

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:27 a.m.

No I won't sign one

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:28 a.m.

I will only sign a stipulation if it includes, to quote, what you said, and that that statement is understood by you. Not me.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:28 a.m.

So you are held to it

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:28 a.m.

Not me

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:29 a.m.

ok great

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:29 a.m.

maybe you should inspect the courthouse hallway, btw @meowiitten

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:30 a.m.

i believe the actual owner of MSM is trying to appear

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:30 a.m.

Judge will have to summon them

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:30 a.m.

sure will

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.

just thought id let you know in case you wanted to go try getting $200,000 out of them too

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.

Good faith reliance on the court's summoning

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.

????

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.

No issue

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.

bro what

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:32 a.m.

I don't know what is so funny buddy. You're acting like I summoned you personally. Clearly this is a very personal matter for you

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:32 a.m.

I am just as much a victim in this as you are, for all I care

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:34 a.m.

anywho

rafellus 2025-05-31 12:40 a.m.

@Awesome

My client, @Crusoe, is in receipt of a defective summons from this Court. It states, in relevant part:

“You are REQUIRED to APPEAR before the court for a lawsuit where you are being sued.” Summons Issued to DanielCrusoe, ¶ 1 (emphasis added).

However, as is evident from even a cursory review of the Complaint, my client is not being sued. Moreover, assuming for the sake of argument that the summons was intended for the named defendant, my client avers that he is neither an officer nor an agent of the named defendant. He therefore cannot accept service on its behalf.

I move that this Court quash its Summons Issued to DanielCrusoe.(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:43 a.m.

Plaintiff joins

rafellus

@Awesome My client, @Crusoe, is in receipt of a defective summons from this Court. It states, in relevant part: “You are REQUIRED to APPEAR before t...(edited)

AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:17 a.m.

Apologies, I was working off of a seemingly outdated Database.

AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:18 a.m.

Summons is quashed.

AwesomePIays used

/remove

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 02:18 a.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has removed @Crusoe from the case channel.

AwesomePIays used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 02:19 a.m.

:x: Unable to DM @britt

Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.(edited)

AwesomePIays used

/remove

clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 02:19 a.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has removed @deleted_user_7542b2415056 from the case channel.

BotclerkFlow

:x: Unable to DM @britt Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.

AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:32 a.m.

@Prothonotary's Office

Summon them, please; clerkFlow can’t.

AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:42 a.m.

@meowiitten

On a sidenote, I don’t know what happened to your separate but related action; it disappeared.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:43 a.m.

@Awesome

I'm amending the complaint right now so you can hold off if you want

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:43 a.m.

I'll probably have it done by tomorrow afternoon EST

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:31 p.m.

@Awesome

Here you go sir!

"Cover Sheet":
- Count 1: Negligence (Respondeat Superior), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 2: Negligent Hiring (Retention/Supervision), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3102.4 ($400,000)
- Count 3: Negligence (Failure to Warn), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 4: Negligence (Negligent Misrepresentation), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 5: Negligence (Negligent Voluntary Undertaking of a Duty of Care), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 6: Strict Liability, Common Law
- Count 7: Declaratory Judgment

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:31 p.m.

Defendants: Mayflower State Militia and Mayflower State Militia Security (SERVE ON: @polyrabies)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:36 p.m.

and @britt

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Defendants: Mayflower State Militia and Mayflower State Militia Security (SERVE ON: @polyrabies)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:48 p.m.

@andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 07:56 p.m.

@Awesome

Please add andysofun

AwesomePIays used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 01:52 a.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @andysofun to the case channel.

AwesomePIays 2025-06-01 01:52 a.m.

@andysofun

File a NOA.

AwesomePIays

@andysofun File a NOA.

andysofun 2025-06-01 06:00 p.m.

I don't believe my client has been served yet

andysofun 2025-06-01 06:00 p.m.

cc @meowiitten

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.

@Awesome

Please server brittate

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.

serve

andysofun

I don't believe my client has been served yet

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.

Are you fine with me doing the command myself or do you want Awesome to do it

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.

Either way one of us is using the bot

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Are you fine with me doing the command myself or do you want Awesome to do it

andysofun 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.

Awesome do it preferably

andysofun 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.

just to make it official (:

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.

It would be official either way but sure

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.

Since the "Clerk" is doing it

AwesomePIays

@Prothonotary's Office Summon them, please; clerkFlow can’t.

AwesomePIays 2025-06-01 09:15 p.m.

^ @andysofun

AwesomePIays used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 09:16 p.m.

:x: Unable to DM @britt

Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.(edited)

BotclerkFlow

:x: Unable to DM @britt Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 09:57 p.m.

@andysofun

AwesomePIays

^ @andysofun

andysofun 2025-06-01 10:04 p.m.

We'll wait for that then

AwesomePIays

@Prothonotary's Office Summon them, please; clerkFlow can’t.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 10:06 p.m.

I'm fairly certain this means that he blocked the bot himself

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 10:06 p.m.

Because I can DM him fine

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ Server2025-06-02 12:24 a.m.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-02 12:24 a.m.

from brit

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-02 12:24 a.m.

@Awesome

Try the summon command again

AwesomePIays used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-02 12:38 a.m.

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @britt

(edited)

andysofun 2025-06-03 11:04 a.m.

Will file notice of appearance

andysofun 2025-06-03 11:04 a.m.

@andysofun

andysofun 2025-06-03 06:41 p.m.

@meowiitten

@Awesome

AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:44 p.m.

@andysofun

File it on the website, please.(edited)

AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:44 p.m.

(You have have been added).(edited)

andysofun 2025-06-03 06:45 p.m.

done

AwesomePIays

@andysofun File it on the website, please.(edited)

andysofun 2025-06-03 06:46 p.m.

I don't think rafellus is an attorney in this case unless I missed something

andysofun 2025-06-03 06:46 p.m.

I believe he was just appearing for danielcrusoe who was wrongly summoned

andysofun

I don't think rafellus is an attorney in this case unless I missed something

AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:47 p.m.

Oops, d/r, forgot he was removed.

andysofun 2025-06-03 06:47 p.m.

I'll likely have a motion to dismiss soon

andysofun

I'll likely have a motion to dismiss soon

AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:47 p.m.

Alright, keep me informed of any developments.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:14 p.m.

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS

Served On: @alex
@andysofun @Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS Served On: @alex

@andysofun

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:14 p.m.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:15 p.m.

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS

Served On: @Caesar
@andysofun @Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS Served On: @Caesar

@andysofun

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:16 p.m.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:17 p.m.

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS

Served On: @britt
@andysofun @Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS Served On: @britt

@andysofun

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:17 p.m.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:18 p.m.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I swear and affirm under penalty of perjury that I have served the above-captioned Notices of Intention to Take Deposition Upon Written Questions and the attached Written Questions upon the above-named individuals.

Dated: 06/03/2025
/s/ sadoimpacto

andysofun 2025-06-03 10:40 p.m.

“Leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 15 days after service of the process and initial pleading on any defendant, except that leave is not required (1) if a defendant has served a notice of taking deposition or otherwise sought discovery, or (2) if special notice is given as provided in subdivision (b)(2) of this rule.” -Rule 27 Mayflower Rules of Civil Procedure
Your honor, under the aforementioned rule the defendants move to strike all three filings with the court (the three notices of intent to take deposition upon written questions). We haven’t sought any discovery yet (we haven’t even responded to the complaint), and the plaintiff gives no special notice. I must also say that I’m very shocked at the plaintiff’s intimidation tactics in the threatening of contempt against the witnesses if they don’t respond, despite the fact that no subpoena has been issued. @Awesome
cc: @meowiitten

andysofun 2025-06-03 10:41 p.m.

I can put that all in writing if preferred by the court, and I can also list more reasons in support of our motion to strike if necessary.

andysofun

“Leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 15 days after service of the process and initial pleading ...

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:53 p.m.

That’s only for oral depositions

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:54 p.m.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:03 p.m.

Nice try sir

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:03 p.m.

Tough but fair

andysofun 2025-06-03 11:04 p.m.

Will file a written motion with more details

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:11 p.m.

I mean go ahead

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:11 p.m.

This is made under rule 24

AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 11:39 p.m.

Ok, first, depositions are allowable only as a matter of civil discovery. Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 24(a) (“Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission.” (emphasis added)). Second, contempt is not the appropriate remedy (at least in the first instance) for non-compliance; a subpoena, Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 30(d), or an order compelling discovery, Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 29(a), is.(edited)

AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 11:42 p.m.

cc: @meowiitten @andysofun

AwesomePIays

Ok, first, depositions are allowable only as a matter of civil discovery. Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 24(a) (“Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: __depo...(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:44 p.m.

To be honest I only put that language because that’s what I saw in a Texas notice of deposition by written questions lol

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:46 p.m.

The first thing would be a motion to compel

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:46 p.m.

The next is a motion for contempt

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:52 p.m.

Anyways I don't know what he was on about

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

The next is a motion for contempt

AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 11:52 p.m.

Yep.

andysofun 2025-06-04 12:23 a.m.

@meowiitten

letting you know as a courtesy that none of the people intend to respond to the requests

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-04 12:38 a.m.

That's perfectly fine

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-04 01:30 a.m.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

@Awesome @andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

@Awesome

@andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-04 01:46 a.m.

NOTICE OF ERRATA: Replace “The Notice” with “The Notices”

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

@Awesome

@andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.

@Awesome

If you wouldn’t mind… my expected window has elapsed

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.

All deponents have been silent

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.

And andysofun has told me they intend not to comply

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.

All of them

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:08 p.m.

We intend to respond to the motion

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

@Awesome

@andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:17 p.m.

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:18 p.m.

Unless discovery is expected to be lengthened in this case then no ruling is hurting me here

andysofun

We intend to respond to the motion

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:19 p.m.

When would the response be in

andysofun

We intend to respond to the motion

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:21 p.m.

Also where is your answer

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:21 p.m.

both will be submitted in a timely manner

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.

ETA

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.

within 48 hours for the motion response

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.

from the time of the motion submission

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.

and within 5 days for the answer

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.

from the time of service

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.

So then I imagine you don’t have an objection to discovery taking at least 20 days(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

So then I imagine you don’t have an objection to discovery taking at least 20 days(edited)

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.

I'm not in a rush right now

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:23 p.m.

Alright

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:23 p.m.

If it needs to take 20 days then it needs to take 20 days

andysofun

I'm not in a rush right now

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:24 p.m.

You’re about a day away from defaulting

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

You’re about a day away from defaulting

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.

How

BotclerkFlow

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @britt

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.

client was served here

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.

5 days to respond after service

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.

You were served earlier

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.

You are the one that matters

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.

He is served through you

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.

I wasn't served with anything

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.

being added to the case channel isn't service

andysofun

I wasn't served with anything

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:31 p.m.

Why even lie

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Why even lie

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:32 p.m.

who served me?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:32 p.m.

Also are you going to refuse my interrogatories if I serve them on you

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.

maybe I'm just forgetting but I'm pretty sure nobody served me

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Also are you going to refuse my interrogatories if I serve them on you

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.

@andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Also are you going to refuse my interrogatories if I serve them on you

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.

Depends on what the interrogatories say

andysofun 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.

I can't answer that without seeing them

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:34 p.m.

Alright I’ll serve those on you maybe later today

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:34 p.m.

I’m not home

andysofun 2025-06-05 02:24 p.m.

filed @meowiitten

@Awesome

andysofun 2025-06-05 02:25 p.m.

also filed on the website

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 02:29 p.m.

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT

@andysofun @Awesome

andysofun

filed @meowiitten

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 02:31 p.m.

@Awesome

I do not think any reply is needed since Rule 27 only applies to oral depositions, and not written depositions:

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome I do not think any reply is needed since Rule 27 only applies to oral depositions, and not written depositions:

AwesomePIays 2025-06-05 06:11 p.m.

I’ll rule on it shortly. I was waiting on the Defendants’ response, which I assumed (correctly) was forthcoming.(edited)

AwesomePIays

I’ll rule on it shortly. I was waiting on the Defendants’ response, which I assumed (correctly) was forthcoming.(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:06 p.m.

Well?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

Well?

AwesomePIays 2025-06-06 05:41 p.m.

I have to write a ruling.

AwesomePIays

I have to write a ruling.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:42 p.m.

Why would you need a ruling

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:42 p.m.

This seems like something you can just deny by a paperless order

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:42 p.m.

Hes trying to assert a rule that only applies to oral depositions to written depositions

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

This seems like something you can just deny by a paperless order

AwesomePIays 2025-06-06 05:44 p.m.

Well, I’m addressing it on a paperless/minute order, but I need to get around to writing the text.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:45 p.m.

Oh fair enough

AwesomePIays 2025-06-06 05:45 p.m.

It’ll be like 6h, tops.(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT

@andysofun

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 06:40 p.m.

@andysofun

Why are you ignoring my interrogatories?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@andysofun Why are you ignoring my interrogatories?

andysofun 2025-06-06 11:18 p.m.

We're not

andysofun 2025-06-06 11:18 p.m.

We can't respond in one day though

andysofun 2025-06-06 11:19 p.m.

People are busy especially with some exams

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 11:19 p.m.

Its Friday

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 11:19 p.m.

Unless you're taking the SAT or ACT there's nothing tomorrow or Sunday buddy

AwesomePIays

It’ll be like 6h, tops.(edited)

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 11:24 p.m.

Anything?

AwesomePIays 2025-06-07 01:35 a.m.

MINUTE ORDER:

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony and Defendants’ Response in Opposition thereto. Defendants’ Counsel of Record, Mr. andysofun, stated that “none of the [Deponents] intend[ed] to respond to the requests.” Plaintiff argues that this amounts to a constructive denial of discovery, and the Court agrees. However, Defendants proffer that this denial was justified because, in their words, written depositions require leave of the Court if taken within fifteen (15) days of service. See Defs.’ Resp. in Opposition to Pl.‘s Mot. to Compel at 1. As the Court indisputably did not grant leave, their argument goes, the written depositions are “prohibited” under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 27(a). But Defendants’ interpretation of Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 27(a) is inapposite; for one thing, the Rule is titled “Depositions Upon Oral Examination.” Defendants’ argument is thus plainly without merit. Titles are, of course, not dispositive of the substantive matter, but the Court can nonetheless look to them as interpretative aids. See Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 221 (2012). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony is GRANTED, and Deponents Nukhz, TyrantAugustusCaesar, and brittate are ORDERED to complete the written depositions sought by Plaintiff, dated 3 June 2025, on or before June 11, 2025 at 6:00 a.m., 3 months ago, barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. Signed by Judge AwesomePIays. (Entered: 06/07/2025).

cc: @meowiitten @andysofun @alex @Caesar @britt

(edited)

AwesomePIays 2025-06-07 01:38 a.m.

Apologies for the slight delay. I had to partially write something else.

andysofun 2025-06-07 12:36 p.m.

@meowiitten

@Awesome

submitted

andysofun

@meowiitten

@Awesome submitted

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-07 02:23 p.m.

PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

@Awesome @andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-08 12:42 a.m.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

@Awesome @andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

@Awesome

@andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-08 12:43 a.m.

PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Plaintiff hereby notices Defendants that he has filed a motion for entry of default.
@andysofun

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-08 12:49 a.m.

andysofun 2025-06-09 02:52 p.m.

filed @meowiitten

@Awesome

andysofun

filed @meowiitten

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-09 08:23 p.m.

Your motion would only apply to 2 of 7 (?) counts

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-09 08:23 p.m.

This is not submitted in lieu of an answer @Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-10 05:54 p.m.

I would ask that you please enforce default against the defendants @Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

I would ask that you please enforce default against the defendants @Awesome

AwesomePIays 2025-06-10 06:31 p.m.

I’ll write up a ruling shortly.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-10 06:31 p.m.

Alright

andysofun 2025-06-10 09:40 p.m.

The deponents should be sending their responses to the written depositions asap

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ Server2025-06-10 11:45 p.m.

AwesomePIays

I’ll write up a ruling shortly.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-11 01:20 p.m.

Please

AwesomePIays used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-11 04:22 p.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @zrihem to the case channel.

AwesomePIays 2025-06-11 04:22 p.m.

AwesomePIays 2025-06-11 04:23 p.m.

@zrihem

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-12 01:14 a.m.

@Awesome

Would you be able to rule on DJ

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-18 08:41 p.m.

@Awesome

SIR!

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-19 01:50 a.m.

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-19 01:50 a.m.

We can proceed

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-19 01:50 a.m.

At least in this one

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

At least in this one

AwesomePIays 2025-06-19 01:51 a.m.

Alright, I’ll rule shortly then. I just needed someone to greenlight this continuing.

AwesomePIays 2025-06-19 01:51 a.m.

I was frankly confused why he also paused this one — it’s a personal injury suit.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-21 09:34 p.m.

@Awesome

Please. Sir.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-21 09:34 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/marky-mark-wahlberg-calvin-klien-model-gif-5888856787783968247

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome Please. Sir.

AwesomePIays 2025-06-21 09:34 p.m.

Yes, I saw. I don’t have an estimate as several other stuff is the priority.

AwesomePIays 2025-06-21 09:35 p.m.

I’ll probably put a calendar or something out, so I don’t have to have a jumbled mess of deadlines.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-30 08:00 p.m.

@Awesome

Sir

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome Sir

AwesomePIays 2025-06-30 08:16 p.m.

It’ll be out by Saturday or Sunday, EST.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-05 10:22 p.m.

@Awesome

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome

AwesomePIays 2025-07-05 10:38 p.m.

It’ll be out by Saturday or Sunday, EST.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-13 03:28 a.m.

@Awesome

Sir

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-17 08:08 p.m.

@Awesome

SIR!

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome SIR!

AwesomePIays 2025-07-18 01:15 a.m.

Apologies. I’ve had a severe electrical storm in my area since this morning. I went to bed and, uh, it’s still here.

So… after whenever that finishes, I guess.(edited)

AwesomePIays 2025-07-18 07:54 p.m.

ok. @meowiitten I’m going in order of whatever’s been on my docket the longest, so https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1335741227651301501 will be out tonight (AEST) or early tomorrow morning.

AwesomePIays 2025-07-18 07:55 p.m.

the rest will be staggered by a day or so.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-19 04:46 p.m.

@Awesome

SIR

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome SIR

AwesomePIays 2025-07-19 07:51 p.m.

I said early tomorrow morning. I just woke up, and I haven’t yet had breakfast.

shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 07:53 a.m.

Let the man eat @meowiitten

AwesomePIays 2025-07-21 04:31 p.m.

Apologies. As an update, this took slightly longer than I was initially expecting. @meowiitten

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-23 04:50 p.m.

@Awesome

SIR

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ

@Awesome SIR

AwesomePIays 2025-07-24 06:26 a.m.

Yes, apologies, this (and the other one) will be out tomorrow or the day following.

AwesomePIays

Yes, apologies, this (and the other one) will be out tomorrow or the day following.

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-11 05:02 p.m.

SIR

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 10:24 a.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Judge Nicklaus_s.

Nicklaus used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 12:13 p.m.

Case Modified

@Nicklaus

has added @meowiitten to the case channel.

Nicklaus used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 12:14 p.m.

Case Modified

@Nicklaus

has added @andysofun to the case channel.

Nicklaus 2025-08-14 04:56 p.m.

@meowiitten

What’s pending here?

Nicklaus_s

@meowiitten What’s pending here?

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-14 05:01 p.m.

This case means nothing to me

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-14 05:01 p.m.

Can you just dismiss it

sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-14 05:01 p.m.

if this was 2 months ago maybe I would've cared

Nicklaus 2025-08-14 07:45 p.m.

MINUTE ORDER: The Court, upon notice by Plaintiff of voluntary dismissal, ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

/s/ Nicklaus_s

NICKLAUS_S
District Judge

Nicklaus used

/transcript

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:51 p.m.

Creating transcript..

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:51 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Volume X.

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:52 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Volume X.

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:52 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Volume X.

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:54 p.m.

Unable to upload transcript. An unknown error has occurred.

Exported 394 messages