guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#sadoimpacto-v-mayflower-state-militia-et-al
This is the start of #sadoimpacto-v-mayflower-state-militia-et-al channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-23 04:08 a.m.
New Case
Case Type
civil
Case Number
CV-198-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-08-28 07:10 p.m.
BrendaPopplewell
BrendaPopplewell 2025-05-23 04:09 a.m.
@Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-23 11:34 a.m.
@Awesome
courthouse hallway
Thread messages not saved.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-24 10:16 p.m.
@Awesome Can you summon dem
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome Can you summon dem
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-24 10:59 p.m.
I will today (likely this evening).
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
I will today (likely this evening).
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-24 10:59 p.m.
Would you be able to hear the 2nd part to this case as well
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Would you be able to hear the 2nd part to this case as well
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-25 01:17 a.m.
Sure. What is it about?
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
Sure. What is it about?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:17 a.m.
Its currently pending its a declaratory judgment action adjacent to this case
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:18 a.m.
Facts were semi-materially different so it didn't make sense to join the counts
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:18 a.m.
In here
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Its currently pending its a declaratory judgment action adjacent to this case
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-25 01:24 a.m.
who’s the Defendant in this semi-adjacent action(edited)
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-25 01:24 a.m.
also MSM?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-25 01:24 a.m.
Yes
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-29 01:14 p.m.
@Awesome Can we summon them
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome Can we summon them
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-30 09:55 a.m.
Apologies, I had an assignment due. This’ll be done tomorrow.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
Apologies, I had an assignment due. This’ll be done tomorrow.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 04:01 p.m.
Cant we just do the summon command
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 04:01 p.m.
Its just /summon
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-30 04:08 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @Crusoe(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Its just /summon
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-30 04:08 p.m.
I forgot that command existed, tbh.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-30 04:48 p.m.
Case Modified
@Awesome has added @Crusoe to the case channel.
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 10:38 p.m.
I am here, your honor.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:08 p.m.
@Crusoe Would you like to discuss a settlement sir
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:09 p.m.
Are you acting as their agent
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:09 p.m.
Umm
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:09 p.m.
What kind of settlement
CrusoeCrusoe
What kind of settlement
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.
What do you believe is fair and just
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.
ok
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.
here is my offer
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:10 p.m.
Also, as as side question, does the MSM consider itself to have a coop with the MNG?
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:11 p.m.
I dont understand that question
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
can you rephrase that
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
A cooperative agreement
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
It says so on your commerce registry page
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
And its in the press as well
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
MSM does cooperate with MNG when times call for it
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
I mean like a literal agreement
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
I cant speak on that
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
Like you have an on-paper agreement
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
Well the MNG said that you do not
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:12 p.m.
In an affidavit
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
Yet it is advertised that you do
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
Ok well I said I cant speak on that
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
Am I being questioned right now?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
No
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
I'm confused and scared
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
you are a judge right?
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
you are interrogating me
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
I'm not this judge
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
Im the plaintiff
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
I didnt take the oath
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:13 p.m.
plaintiff? you're a sheriff?
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
why does your role say judge
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
I also happen to be a judge
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
I am a judge but I am the Plaintiff in this lawsuit against the MSM
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
what is a plantain
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
Its the name for someone who brings a lawsuit
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
You are the Defendant
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
so you are the judge and the suer??
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
that seems unfair
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:14 p.m.
AwesomePIays is the judge(edited)
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.
@Awesome Motion to dismiss
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.
Plaintiff (the one bringing the suit) = Me
Defendant (MSM) = You
Judge = AwesomePIays
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.
ok can we settle this without a trial
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.
Ok!
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:15 p.m.
Make your offer to settle
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Plaintiff (the one bringing the suit) = Me Defendant (MSM) = You Judge = AwesomePIays
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:20 p.m.
sheeeeeit
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:20 p.m.
I aint even know dat fr
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:21 p.m.
thats real helpful mane
CrusoeCrusoe
Make your offer to settle
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.
Here are my terms:
(1) $200,000 in damages.
(2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release channel:
“The Mayflower State Militia has no cooperative agreement, affiliation, endorsement, or operational relationship—formal or informal, explicit or implicit—with the Mayflower National Guard or any other branch of the Mayflower state government.”
(3) A formal public apology issued by the Defendant, acknowledging the following:
- The events described in the Complaint occurred;
- The conduct of Corporal TyrantAugustusCaesar and other members was unacceptable;
- The organization failed in its duty to protect the public and uphold the standards it claims to represent.
(4) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release channel:
“The Mayflower State Militia failed to properly supervise its personnel, failed to provide adequate emergency response during a critical incident, and failed to adhere to the standards required of any group conducting public operations involving civilians.”
(5) The parties agree that this settlement shall not be subject to a confidentiality agreement, and the Plaintiff may publicly discuss the terms and factual basis of the Complaint and resolution.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Here are my terms: (1) $200,000 in damages. (2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release chan...
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.
Counter offer:
You pay Mr. TyrantAugustusCaesar $1,000,000 UCD for the cosmetic damages sustained to his vehicle after your fat ahh rolled off his bumper.
CrusoeCrusoe
Counter offer: You pay Mr. TyrantAugustusCaesar $1,000,000 UCD for the cosmetic damages sustained to his vehicle after your fat ahh rolled off his bumper.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.
Motion for contempt, sir @tyrant
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.
I summon my legal counsel @rafellus
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.
Almost pinged your employee!
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Motion for contempt, sir @tyrant
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.
contempt?
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:24 p.m.
I made my offer
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:25 p.m.
the judge hasnt said anything I dont know why you've rolled the ball so far
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:25 p.m.
as a judge id expect you to be more professional
CrusoeCrusoe
I summon my legal counsel @rafellus
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:26 p.m.
now please add my legal counsel
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:26 p.m.
Awesome should be the one doing that but since I can I'll just do it for him
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-30 11:26 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @rafellus to the case channel.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Here are my terms: (1) $200,000 in damages. (2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release chan...
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:27 p.m.
@rafellus
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.
Tsk tsk.
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.
sir, this plaintiff was berating me and asking me confusing questions
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.
Notifying you that the cap on punitive damages in this case is $900,000
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.
I didnt know how to act
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.
Ive never been on the stand before
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Notifying you that the cap on punitive damages in this case is $900,000
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.
Please do not discuss with my client any further, counselor. :🤨:
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Here are my terms: (1) $200,000 in damages. (2) A permanently exhibited, formal public statement issued by the Defendant, posted in the Mayflower State Militia's press release chan...
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:28 p.m.
@rafellus
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:29 p.m.
Yeah, we are denying that offer.
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:29 p.m.
My client is...at least.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:29 p.m.
Alright then
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
Thought it was fair, but I guess we can shoot for around $650,000 after trial
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
Seems fair
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
in
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
your
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
dreams
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
You can shoot for whatever you want, sadoimpacto.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
Actually, summary judgment sounds nice
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
mr sado
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:30 p.m.
Why is DanieICrusoe here? I understand your issue is with TyrantAugustusCaesar?
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.
yea
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.
He is not a named defendant
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.
Uh huh..
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.
Does the MSM claim to maintain a formal cooperative agreement with the MNG, sir?
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:31 p.m.
Are you going to answer my question as to why DanieICrusoe was summoned?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.
I didn't summon him personally
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.
He is the agent of the MSM
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.
He is properly summoned
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.
So what do you think DanieICrusoe has done wrong?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:32 p.m.
You can read the complaint, which I will likely be amending
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:33 p.m.
Right. DanieICrusoe is not, and for a long time has not been, affiliated with the named defendant.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:34 p.m.
Did he give up his ownership stake in the MSM?
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:34 p.m.
I am not interested in discussing my client's situation with you past what I have already commented on.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:34 p.m.
Alright, then I'll just have to move for discovery
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
And we can compel whatever we need from you(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
Sorry, I
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
Not sure how you intend to move for discovery when no defendant has been properly summoned
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
but ok king go off
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
slay lawyer :💅:
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
You could just say you have no ownership stake in the MSM and move on?
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
I cannot disclose that
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:35 p.m.
You could easily be discharged from this case
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.
Well, there is the matter of attorney's fees that my client has incurred
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.
as a result of the issue
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.
that you have created
rafellusrafellus
Not sure how you intend to move for discovery when no defendant has been properly summoned
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.
You have no claim for insufficient process and/or abuse of process if you act in an obstructive manner
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:36 p.m.
What obstructive manner am I acting in? lmao?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:37 p.m.
Okay, I'm going to prepare a notice of deposition then
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:37 p.m.
And you can put this all on the record
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-30 11:37 p.m.
And I'll just move for sanctions if you keep doing this
Crusoe
Crusoe 2025-05-30 11:38 p.m.
:😨:
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
And I'll just move for sanctions if you keep doing this
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:42 p.m.
Erm..nothing I have done warrants sanctions?
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:46 p.m.
@meowiitten you can sign stipulation that this court has no jurisdiction over my client, @Crusoe
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:46 p.m.
otherwise we will request an evidentiary hearing re a motion on the same subject
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:47 p.m.
and, when you realize my client has been improperly summoned, we will demand legal fees
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-30 11:47 p.m.
up to you
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
He is not a named defendant
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:15 a.m.
“You are REQUIRED to APPEAR before the court for a lawsuit where you are being sued.” Summons Issued to DanielCrusoe, ¶ 1.
this is the summons my client received, fyi
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.
if you want the named defendant, the mayflower state militia, to appear...maybe try issuing a summons that names it
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.
Well I didn't summon you, the Court summoned you
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.
I didn't ask for him to be summoned
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.
But alas
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.
All will be discovered soon
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:16 a.m.
alas the named defendant is not summoned :😔:
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.
you summoned some random guy with no connection to your complaint
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.
and, despite being told that by an officer of this court, you refuse to act
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.
I didn't name him in the complaint, nor did I summon him personally
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.
Are you going to sue the judge or the clerk now?
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.
nobody said anything about suing?
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:17 a.m.
i just said the named defendant is not summoned
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:18 a.m.
and you continue to ignore the fact that my client has no affiliation with the mayflower state militia, which i have repeatedly informed you
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:19 a.m.
Then you can ping the judge and tell him that
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:19 a.m.
And he will discharge you
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:19 a.m.
Why are you pinging me?
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:20 a.m.
i mean you did just try to coerce $200,000 from my client, so i want you to understand his relationship to this action
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:20 a.m.
before you go on harrassing him any further
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:20 a.m.
And you obstructed when I asked if he had any relation to the MSM
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
Refusing to answer when you have the answer is obstructive
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
first of all, I am under no obligation to answer your questions
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
It would've been a yes or a no
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
second of all, despite having no obligation, I did answer your questions
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
You are. You're under an ethical obligation
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
uh no
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
The information was unpriveleged and material to the process of this court
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
no ethical obligation charges me with providing you discovery absent a valid discovery request
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:21 a.m.
but ok go off king
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.
Hence why I was going to put him under deposition
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.
No problem
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.
We can do that
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:22 a.m.
can't do anything here until you actually issue a summons to the defendant /shrug
rafellusrafellus
Right. DanieICrusoe is not, and for a long time has not been, affiliated with the named defendant.
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.
anyway I've already answered your question
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.
I don't need a summons to give him a notice of deposition, actually
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.
Under our rules, its investigatory
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.
And can be done pre-suit
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:23 a.m.
false
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:24 a.m.
Rule 27(a)
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:24 a.m.
"Leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 15 days after service of the process and initial pleading."
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:25 a.m.
Well then I recant on it being pre-suit. That slipped my mind. But I can still depose him
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:26 a.m.
i mean i already answered your question is the fact you keep ignoring
rafellusrafellus
Right. DanieICrusoe is not, and for a long time has not been, affiliated with the named defendant.
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:26 a.m.
.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:27 a.m.
Tell the judge to discharge you then
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:27 a.m.
i already asked if you would sign a stipulation doing it
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:27 a.m.
No I won't sign one
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:28 a.m.
I will only sign a stipulation if it includes, to quote, what you said, and that that statement is understood by you. Not me.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:28 a.m.
So you are held to it
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:28 a.m.
Not me
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:29 a.m.
ok great
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:29 a.m.
maybe you should inspect the courthouse hallway, btw @meowiitten
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:30 a.m.
i believe the actual owner of MSM is trying to appear :🙂:
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:30 a.m.
Judge will have to summon them
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:30 a.m.
sure will
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.
just thought id let you know in case you wanted to go try getting $200,000 out of them too
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.
Good faith reliance on the court's summoning
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.
????
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.
No issue
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:31 a.m.
bro what :😭:
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:32 a.m.
I don't know what is so funny buddy. You're acting like I summoned you personally. Clearly this is a very personal matter for you
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:32 a.m.
I am just as much a victim in this as you are, for all I care
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:34 a.m.
anywho
rafellus
rafellus 2025-05-31 12:40 a.m.
@Awesome

My client, @Crusoe, is in receipt of a defective summons from this Court. It states, in relevant part:

“You are REQUIRED to APPEAR before the court for a lawsuit where you are being sued.” Summons Issued to DanielCrusoe, ¶ 1 (emphasis added).

However, as is evident from even a cursory review of the Complaint, my client is not being sued. Moreover, assuming for the sake of argument that the summons was intended for the named defendant, my client avers that he is neither an officer nor an agent of the named defendant. He therefore cannot accept service on its behalf.

I move that this Court quash its Summons Issued to DanielCrusoe.
(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 12:43 a.m.
Plaintiff joins
rafellusrafellus
@Awesome My client, @Crusoe, is in receipt of a defective summons from this Court. It states, in relevant part: “You are REQUIRED to APPEAR before t...(edited)
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:17 a.m.
Apologies, I was working off of a seemingly outdated Database.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:18 a.m.
Summons is quashed.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 02:18 a.m.
Case Modified
@Awesome has removed @Crusoe from the case channel.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 02:19 a.m.
:x: Unable to DM @britt
Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.
(edited)
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-31 02:19 a.m.
Case Modified
@Awesome has removed @deleted_user_7542b2415056 from the case channel.
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
:x: Unable to DM @britt Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:32 a.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Summon them, please; clerkFlow can’t.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-05-31 02:42 a.m.
@meowiitten On a sidenote, I don’t know what happened to your separate but related action; it disappeared.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:43 a.m.
@Awesome I'm amending the complaint right now so you can hold off if you want
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:43 a.m.
I'll probably have it done by tomorrow afternoon EST
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:31 p.m.
@Awesome Here you go sir!

"Cover Sheet":
- Count 1: Negligence (Respondeat Superior), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 2: Negligent Hiring (Retention/Supervision), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3102.4 ($400,000)
- Count 3: Negligence (Failure to Warn), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 4: Negligence (Negligent Misrepresentation), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 5: Negligence (Negligent Voluntary Undertaking of a Duty of Care), 5 M.S.C. 1 § 3101.4 ($500,000)
- Count 6: Strict Liability, Common Law
- Count 7: Declaratory Judgment
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:31 p.m.
Defendants: Mayflower State Militia and Mayflower State Militia Security (SERVE ON: @polyrabies)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:36 p.m.
and @britt
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Defendants: Mayflower State Militia and Mayflower State Militia Security (SERVE ON: @polyrabies)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 02:48 p.m.
@andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-05-31 07:56 p.m.
@Awesome Please add andysofun
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 01:52 a.m.
Case Modified
@Awesome has added @andysofun to the case channel.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-01 01:52 a.m.
@andysofun File a NOA.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
@andysofun File a NOA.
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-01 06:00 p.m.
I don't believe my client has been served yet
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-01 06:00 p.m.
cc @meowiitten
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.
@Awesome Please server brittate
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.
serve
andysofunandysofun
I don't believe my client has been served yet
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.
Are you fine with me doing the command myself or do you want Awesome to do it
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:01 p.m.
Either way one of us is using the bot
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Are you fine with me doing the command myself or do you want Awesome to do it
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.
Awesome do it preferably
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.
just to make it official (:
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.
It would be official either way but sure
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 06:02 p.m.
Since the "Clerk" is doing it
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
@Prothonotary's Office Summon them, please; clerkFlow can’t.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-01 09:15 p.m.
^ @andysofun
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-01 09:16 p.m.
:x: Unable to DM @britt
Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.
(edited)
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
:x: Unable to DM @britt Maybe their DMs are off, the bot is blocked, or they aren't in the main clark or court servers.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 09:57 p.m.
@andysofun
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
^ @andysofun
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-01 10:04 p.m.
We'll wait for that then
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
@Prothonotary's Office Summon them, please; clerkFlow can’t.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 10:06 p.m.
I'm fairly certain this means that he blocked the bot himself
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-01 10:06 p.m.
Because I can DM him fine
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ Server2025-06-02 12:24 a.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-02 12:24 a.m.
from brit
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-02 12:24 a.m.
@Awesome Try the summon command again
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-02 12:38 a.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @britt(edited)
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 11:04 a.m.
Will file notice of appearance
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 11:04 a.m.
@andysofun
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 06:41 p.m.
@meowiitten @Awesome
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:44 p.m.
@andysofun File it on the website, please.(edited)
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:44 p.m.
(You have have been added).(edited)
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 06:45 p.m.
done :👍:
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
@andysofun File it on the website, please.(edited)
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 06:46 p.m.
I don't think rafellus is an attorney in this case unless I missed something
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 06:46 p.m.
I believe he was just appearing for danielcrusoe who was wrongly summoned
andysofunandysofun
I don't think rafellus is an attorney in this case unless I missed something
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:47 p.m.
Oops, d/r, forgot he was removed.
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 06:47 p.m.
I'll likely have a motion to dismiss soon
andysofunandysofun
I'll likely have a motion to dismiss soon
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 06:47 p.m.
Alright, keep me informed of any developments.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:14 p.m.
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS
Served On: @alex
@andysofun @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS Served On: @alex @andysofun @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:14 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:15 p.m.
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS
Served On: @Caesar
@andysofun @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS Served On: @Caesar @andysofun @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:16 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:17 p.m.
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS
Served On: @britt
@andysofun @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS Served On: @britt @andysofun @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:17 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:18 p.m.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I swear and affirm under penalty of perjury that I have served the above-captioned Notices of Intention to Take Deposition Upon Written Questions and the attached Written Questions upon the above-named individuals.

Dated: 06/03/2025
/s/ sadoimpacto
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 10:40 p.m.
“Leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 15 days after service of the process and initial pleading on any defendant, except that leave is not required (1) if a defendant has served a notice of taking deposition or otherwise sought discovery, or (2) if special notice is given as provided in subdivision (b)(2) of this rule.” -Rule 27 Mayflower Rules of Civil Procedure
Your honor, under the aforementioned rule the defendants move to strike all three filings with the court (the three notices of intent to take deposition upon written questions). We haven’t sought any discovery yet (we haven’t even responded to the complaint), and the plaintiff gives no special notice. I must also say that I’m very shocked at the plaintiff’s intimidation tactics in the threatening of contempt against the witnesses if they don’t respond, despite the fact that no subpoena has been issued. @Awesome
cc: @meowiitten
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 10:41 p.m.
I can put that all in writing if preferred by the court, and I can also list more reasons in support of our motion to strike if necessary.
andysofunandysofun
“Leave of court, granted with or without notice, must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 15 days after service of the process and initial pleading ...
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:53 p.m.
That’s only for oral depositions
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 10:54 p.m.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:03 p.m.
Nice try sir
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:03 p.m.
Tough but fair
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-03 11:04 p.m.
Will file a written motion with more details
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:11 p.m.
I mean go ahead
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:11 p.m.
This is made under rule 24
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 11:39 p.m.
Ok, first, depositions are allowable only as a matter of civil discovery. Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 24(a) (“Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property for inspection and other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission.” (emphasis added)). Second, contempt is not the appropriate remedy (at least in the first instance) for non-compliance; a subpoena, Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 30(d), or an order compelling discovery, Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 29(a), is.(edited)
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 11:42 p.m.
cc: @meowiitten @andysofun
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
Ok, first, depositions are allowable only as a matter of civil discovery. Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 24(a) (“Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: __depo...(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:44 p.m.
To be honest I only put that language because that’s what I saw in a Texas notice of deposition by written questions lol
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:46 p.m.
The first thing would be a motion to compel
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:46 p.m.
The next is a motion for contempt
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-03 11:52 p.m.
Anyways I don't know what he was on about
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
The next is a motion for contempt
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-03 11:52 p.m.
Yep.
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-04 12:23 a.m.
@meowiitten letting you know as a courtesy that none of the people intend to respond to the requests
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-04 12:38 a.m.
That's perfectly fine
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-04 01:30 a.m.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
@Awesome @andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE @Awesome @andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-04 01:46 a.m.
NOTICE OF ERRATA: Replace “The Notice” with “The Notices”
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE @Awesome @andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.
@Awesome If you wouldn’t mind… my expected window has elapsed
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.
All deponents have been silent
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.
And andysofun has told me they intend not to comply
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 12:43 a.m.
All of them
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:08 p.m.
We intend to respond to the motion
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS’ AGENTS AND/OR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE @Awesome @andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:17 p.m.
@Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:18 p.m.
Unless discovery is expected to be lengthened in this case then no ruling is hurting me here
andysofunandysofun
We intend to respond to the motion
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:19 p.m.
When would the response be in
andysofunandysofun
We intend to respond to the motion
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:21 p.m.
Also where is your answer
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:21 p.m.
both will be submitted in a timely manner
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.
ETA
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.
within 48 hours for the motion response
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.
from the time of the motion submission
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.
and within 5 days for the answer
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.
from the time of service
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.
So then I imagine you don’t have an objection to discovery taking at least 20 days(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
So then I imagine you don’t have an objection to discovery taking at least 20 days(edited)
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:22 p.m.
I'm not in a rush right now
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:23 p.m.
Alright
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:23 p.m.
If it needs to take 20 days then it needs to take 20 days
andysofunandysofun
I'm not in a rush right now
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:24 p.m.
You’re about a day away from defaulting
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
You’re about a day away from defaulting
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.
How
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @britt
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.
client was served here
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.
5 days to respond after service
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.
You were served earlier
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.
You are the one that matters
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:25 p.m.
He is served through you
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.
I wasn't served with anything
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:26 p.m.
being added to the case channel isn't service
andysofunandysofun
I wasn't served with anything
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:31 p.m.
Why even lie
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Why even lie
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:32 p.m.
who served me?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:32 p.m.
Also are you going to refuse my interrogatories if I serve them on you
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.
maybe I'm just forgetting but I'm pretty sure nobody served me
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Also are you going to refuse my interrogatories if I serve them on you
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.
@andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Also are you going to refuse my interrogatories if I serve them on you
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.
Depends on what the interrogatories say
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 01:33 p.m.
I can't answer that without seeing them
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:34 p.m.
Alright I’ll serve those on you maybe later today
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 01:34 p.m.
I’m not home
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 02:24 p.m.
filed @meowiitten @Awesome
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-05 02:25 p.m.
also filed on the website
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 02:29 p.m.
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
@andysofun @Awesome
andysofunandysofun
filed @meowiitten @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-05 02:31 p.m.
@Awesome I do not think any reply is needed since Rule 27 only applies to oral depositions, and not written depositions:
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome I do not think any reply is needed since Rule 27 only applies to oral depositions, and not written depositions:
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-05 06:11 p.m.
I’ll rule on it shortly. I was waiting on the Defendants’ response, which I assumed (correctly) was forthcoming.(edited)
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
I’ll rule on it shortly. I was waiting on the Defendants’ response, which I assumed (correctly) was forthcoming.(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:06 p.m.
Well?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
Well?
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-06 05:41 p.m.
I have to write a ruling.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
I have to write a ruling.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:42 p.m.
Why would you need a ruling
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:42 p.m.
This seems like something you can just deny by a paperless order
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:42 p.m.
Hes trying to assert a rule that only applies to oral depositions to written depositions
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
This seems like something you can just deny by a paperless order
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-06 05:44 p.m.
Well, I’m addressing it on a paperless/minute order, but I need to get around to writing the text.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 05:45 p.m.
Oh fair enough
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-06 05:45 p.m.
It’ll be like 6h, tops.(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT @andysofun @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 06:40 p.m.
@andysofun Why are you ignoring my interrogatories?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@andysofun Why are you ignoring my interrogatories?
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-06 11:18 p.m.
We're not
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-06 11:18 p.m.
We can't respond in one day though
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-06 11:19 p.m.
People are busy especially with some exams
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 11:19 p.m.
Its Friday
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 11:19 p.m.
Unless you're taking the SAT or ACT there's nothing tomorrow or Sunday buddy
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
It’ll be like 6h, tops.(edited)
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-06 11:24 p.m.
Anything?
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-07 01:35 a.m.
MINUTE ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony and Defendants’ Response in Opposition thereto. Defendants’ Counsel of Record, Mr. andysofun, stated that “none of the [Deponents] intend[ed] to respond to the requests.” Plaintiff argues that this amounts to a constructive denial of discovery, and the Court agrees. However, Defendants proffer that this denial was justified because, in their words, written depositions require leave of the Court if taken within fifteen (15) days of service. See Defs.’ Resp. in Opposition to Pl.‘s Mot. to Compel at 1. As the Court indisputably did not grant leave, their argument goes, the written depositions are “prohibited” under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 27(a). But Defendants’ interpretation of Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 27(a) is inapposite; for one thing, the Rule is titled “Depositions Upon Oral Examination.” Defendants’ argument is thus plainly without merit. Titles are, of course, not dispositive of the substantive matter, but the Court can nonetheless look to them as interpretative aids. See Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 221 (2012). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony is GRANTED, and Deponents Nukhz, TyrantAugustusCaesar, and brittate are ORDERED to complete the written depositions sought by Plaintiff, dated 3 June 2025, on or before June 11, 2025 at 6:00 a.m., 3 months ago, barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. Signed by Judge AwesomePIays. (Entered: 06/07/2025).

cc: @meowiitten @andysofun @alex @Caesar @britt
(edited)
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-07 01:38 a.m.
Apologies for the slight delay. I had to partially write something else.
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-07 12:36 p.m.
@meowiitten @Awesome submitted
andysofunandysofun
@meowiitten @Awesome submitted
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-07 02:23 p.m.
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
@Awesome @andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-08 12:42 a.m.
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
@Awesome @andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT @Awesome @andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-08 12:43 a.m.
PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
Plaintiff hereby notices Defendants that he has filed a motion for entry of default.
@andysofun
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-08 12:49 a.m.
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-09 02:52 p.m.
filed @meowiitten @Awesome
andysofunandysofun
filed @meowiitten @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-09 08:23 p.m.
Your motion would only apply to 2 of 7 (?) counts
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-09 08:23 p.m.
This is not submitted in lieu of an answer @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-10 05:54 p.m.
I would ask that you please enforce default against the defendants @Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
I would ask that you please enforce default against the defendants @Awesome
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-10 06:31 p.m.
I’ll write up a ruling shortly.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-10 06:31 p.m.
Alright
andysofun
andysofun 2025-06-10 09:40 p.m.
The deponents should be sending their responses to the written depositions asap
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ Server2025-06-10 11:45 p.m.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
I’ll write up a ruling shortly.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-11 01:20 p.m.
Please
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-11 04:22 p.m.
Case Modified
@Awesome has added @zrihem to the case channel.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-11 04:22 p.m.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-11 04:23 p.m.
@zrihem
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-12 01:14 a.m.
@Awesome Would you be able to rule on DJ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-18 08:41 p.m.
@Awesome SIR!
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-19 01:50 a.m.
@Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-19 01:50 a.m.
We can proceed
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-19 01:50 a.m.
At least in this one
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
At least in this one
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-19 01:51 a.m.
Alright, I’ll rule shortly then. I just needed someone to greenlight this continuing.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-19 01:51 a.m.
I was frankly confused why he also paused this one — it’s a personal injury suit.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-21 09:34 p.m.
@Awesome Please. Sir.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome Please. Sir.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-21 09:34 p.m.
Yes, I saw. I don’t have an estimate as several other stuff is the priority.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-21 09:35 p.m.
I’ll probably put a calendar or something out, so I don’t have to have a jumbled mess of deadlines.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-06-30 08:00 p.m.
@Awesome Sir
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome Sir
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-06-30 08:16 p.m.
It’ll be out by Saturday or Sunday, EST.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-05 10:22 p.m.
@Awesome
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-07-05 10:38 p.m.
It’ll be out by Saturday or Sunday, EST.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-13 03:28 a.m.
@Awesome Sir
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-17 08:08 p.m.
@Awesome SIR!
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome SIR!
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-07-18 01:15 a.m.
Apologies. I’ve had a severe electrical storm in my area since this morning. I went to bed and, uh, it’s still here. :😭: So… after whenever that finishes, I guess.(edited)
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-07-18 07:54 p.m.
ok. @meowiitten I’m going in order of whatever’s been on my docket the longest, so https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1335741227651301501 will be out tonight (AEST) or early tomorrow morning.
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-07-18 07:55 p.m.
the rest will be staggered by a day or so.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-19 04:46 p.m.
@Awesome SIR
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome SIR
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-07-19 07:51 p.m.
I said early tomorrow morning. I just woke up, and I haven’t yet had breakfast.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 07:53 a.m.
Let the man eat @meowiitten
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-07-21 04:31 p.m.
Apologies. As an update, this took slightly longer than I was initially expecting. @meowiitten
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-07-23 04:50 p.m.
@Awesome SIR
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄsadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
@Awesome SIR
AwesomePIays
AwesomePIays 2025-07-24 06:26 a.m.
Yes, apologies, this (and the other one) will be out tomorrow or the day following.
AwesomePIaysAwesomePIays
Yes, apologies, this (and the other one) will be out tomorrow or the day following.
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-11 05:02 p.m.
SIR
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 10:24 a.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Judge Nicklaus_s.
NicklausNicklaus used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 12:13 p.m.
Case Modified
@Nicklaus has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
NicklausNicklaus used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-13 12:14 p.m.
Case Modified
@Nicklaus has added @andysofun to the case channel.
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-08-14 04:56 p.m.
@meowiitten What’s pending here?
Nicklaus_sNicklaus_s
@meowiitten What’s pending here?
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-14 05:01 p.m.
This case means nothing to me
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-14 05:01 p.m.
Can you just dismiss it
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ
sadoimpacto ᴘᴄ 2025-08-14 05:01 p.m.
if this was 2 months ago maybe I would've cared
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-08-14 07:45 p.m.
MINUTE ORDER: The Court, upon notice by Plaintiff of voluntary dismissal, ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

/s/ Nicklaus_s
NICKLAUS_S
District Judge
NicklausNicklaus used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:51 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:51 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume X.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:52 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume X.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:52 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume X.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-16 08:54 p.m.
Unable to upload transcript. An unknown error has occurred.
Exported 394 messages